This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever
- From: "Weddington, Eric" <eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com>
- To: "Steven Bosscher" <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>, "GCC" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Cc: <hp at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:35:17 -0700
- Subject: RE: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever
- References: <571f6b510712181659w64b16ae5ndc32b38de6f5c56c@mail.gmail.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Bosscher [mailto:stevenb.gcc@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 6:00 PM
> To: GCC
> Cc: hp@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever
>
> Maybe it is just me, but I find it very annoying to have to wade
> through long bug lists, so I just don't do this. Instead I just don't
> look at P4/P5 regressions anymore at all. It's just too much trouble
> to find a bug report where the reporter or the target maintainer cares
> as much as you do about resolving the bug.
I understand your frustration.
I know that some AVR target bugs might fit in your category that you
describe. However a few of us are working to resolve the situation at
least for the AVR target. If you any problems, issues, complaints, or
patches ;-) about/for the AVR target, please let me know so they can be
addressed. Thanks.
Eric Weddington
Product Manager
Atmel