This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Something is broken in repack. Why not with fork and pipes?
- From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes dot Schindelin at gmx dot de>
- To: "J.C. Pizarro" <jcpiza at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation dot org>, Andreas Ericsson <ae at op5 dot se>, David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>, Nicolas Pitre <nico at cam dot org>, jonsmirl at gmail dot com, Junio C Hamano <gitster at pobox dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, git at vger dot kernel dot org
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:41:30 +0000 (GMT)
- Subject: Re: Something is broken in repack. Why not with fork and pipes?
- References: <998d0e4a0712121047m3cb09f37qc3157b96e5d171e7@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, J.C. Pizarro wrote:
> It's good idea if it's for 24/365.25 that it does
> autorepack-compute-again-again-again-those-unexplored-deltas of
> git repositories in realtime. :D
This sentence does not parse.
> Some body can do "git clone" that it could give smaller that one hour ago :D
Neither does this.
> To Linus, Why don't you forget the threaded implementation of your
> repo-pack?
Please do a little research before you ask such questions: it is neither
Linus who did it, nor is it better to use processes than threads.
Besides, your proposal has nothing to do with the issue of this thread
(memory consumption).
Ciao,
Dscho