This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Something is broken in repack
- From: "Daniel Berlin" <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- To: "Jon Smirl" <jonsmirl at gmail dot com>
- Cc: "Nicolas Pitre" <nico at cam dot org>, "Junio C Hamano" <gitster at pobox dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, "Git Mailing List" <git at vger dot kernel dot org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:28:25 -0500
- Subject: Re: Something is broken in repack
- References: <9e4733910712071505y6834f040k37261d65a2d445c4@mail.gmail.com> <9e4733910712101825l33cdc2c0mca2ddbfd5afdb298@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LFD.0.99999.0712102231570.555@xanadu.home> <9e4733910712102125w56c70c0cxb8b00a060b62077@mail.gmail.com> <9e4733910712102129v140c2affqf2e73e75855b61ea@mail.gmail.com> <9e4733910712102301p5e6c4165v6afb32d157478828@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/11/07, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Total CPU time 196 CPU minutes vs 190 for gcc. Google's claims of
> being faster are not true.
Depends on your allocation patterns. For our apps, it certainly is :)
Of course, i don't know if we've updated the external allocator in a
while, i'll bug the people in charge of it.