This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Revisiting GCC's minimum MPFR version

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 16:36:52 -0800
Subject: Re: Revisiting GCC's minimum MPFR version
References: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0712091701160.22215@caipclassic.rutgers.edu> <84fc9c000712091521w11b4ef73i4418cb873496a579@mail.gmail.com>

Richard Guenther wrote:

> I would update the recommended version to 2.3.0 and fail for anything less
> than 2.2.1.

I agree.  Not optimizing bessel functions as builtins doesn't bother me
too much, but we might as well move past the buggy version.

Thanks,

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713

Follow-Ups:
- PATCH: Update MPFR versions (was Re: Revisiting GCC's minimum MPFR version)
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI

References:
- Revisiting GCC's minimum MPFR version
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI
- Re: Revisiting GCC's minimum MPFR version
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]