This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse?

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu>
To: "J.C. Pizarro" <jcpiza at gmail dot com>
Cc: "Joe Buck" <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 07 Dec 2007 15:07:39 -0600
Subject: Re: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse?
References: <998d0e4a0712070924w3e8cbfa0pe6fbc98553e44a48@mail.gmail.com> <061401c838f8$74373880$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <20071207175005.GB12580@synopsys.com> <998d0e4a0712071009y5b2b8bc8x2d5940461a171538@mail.gmail.com>

"J.C. Pizarro" <jcpiza@gmail.com> writes:

| > But random suggestions based on something you read in school are useless
| 
| You're wrong. My suggestions are not based from school and are not useless.
| My suggestions are based from university, books, papers and internet

What is the difference?

-- Gaby

References:
- RE: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse?
  - From: J.C. Pizarro
- RE: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse?
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse?
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse?
  - From: J.C. Pizarro

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]