This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Git and GCC
- From: Giovanni Bajo <rasky at develer dot com>
- To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation dot org>
- Cc: David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>, jonsmirl at gmail dot com, peff at peff dot net, nico at cam dot org, dberlin at dberlin dot org, harvey dot harrison at gmail dot com, ismail at pardus dot org dot tr, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, git at vger dot kernel dot org
- Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 21:26:54 +0100
- Subject: Re: Git and GCC
- Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gcc.devel, gmane.comp.version-control.git
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20071207063848.GA13101@coredump.intra.peff.net> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <alpine.LFD.email@example.com>
On 12/7/2007 6:23 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Is SHA a significant portion of the compute during these repacks?
I should run oprofile...
SHA1 is almost totally insignificant on x86. It hardly shows up. But we
have a good optimized version there.
zlib tends to be a lot more noticeable (especially the uncompression: it
may be faster than compression, but it's done _so_ much more that it
Have you considered alternatives, like: