This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Git and GCC

From: Giovanni Bajo <rasky at develer dot com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation dot org>
Cc: David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>, jonsmirl at gmail dot com, peff at peff dot net, nico at cam dot org, dberlin at dberlin dot org, harvey dot harrison at gmail dot com, ismail at pardus dot org dot tr, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, git at vger dot kernel dot org
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 21:26:54 +0100
Subject: Re: Git and GCC
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gcc.devel, gmane.comp.version-control.git
References: <20071206.193121.40404287.davem@davemloft.net> <20071207063848.GA13101@coredump.intra.peff.net> <9e4733910712062310s30153afibc44a5550fd9ea99@mail.gmail.com> <20071207.045329.204650714.davem@davemloft.net> <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0712070919590.7274@woody.linux-foundation.org>

On 12/7/2007 6:23 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:

Is SHA a significant portion of the compute during these repacks?
I should run oprofile...
SHA1 is almost totally insignificant on x86. It hardly shows up. But we have a good optimized version there.

zlib tends to be a lot more noticeable (especially the uncompression: it may be faster than compression, but it's done _so_ much more that it totally dominates).


Have you considered alternatives, like:
http://www.oberhumer.com/opensource/ucl/
--
Giovanni Bajo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Git and GCC
  - From: Jakub Narebski

References:
- Re: Git and GCC
  - From: David Miller
- Re: Git and GCC
  - From: Jeff King
- Re: Git and GCC
  - From: Jon Smirl
- Re: Git and GCC
  - From: David Miller
- Re: Git and GCC
  - From: Linus Torvalds

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]