This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Git and GCC

From: Andrey Belevantsev <abel at ispras dot ru>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:35:41 +0300
Subject: Re: Git and GCC
References: <4aca3dc20712051108s216d3331t8061ef45b9aa324a@mail.gmail.com> <2007-12-05-21-23-14+trackit+sam@rfc1149.net> <4aca3dc20712051347v6bb8a4dbm901d1d9ddf1dff34@mail.gmail.com> <b609cb3b0712051356r5ca953bei8803e259429a6a5f@mail.gmail.com> <m3sl2fwuyy.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <20071206192859.GU5855@prunille.vinc17.org>

Vincent Lefevre wrote:

It's surprising that you don't mention svk, which is based on top
of Subversion[*]. Has anyone tried? Is there any problem with it?

I must agree with Ismail's reply here. We have used svk for our internal development for about two years, for the reason of easy mirroring of gcc trunk and branching from it locally. I would not complain about its speed, but sometimes we had problems with merge from trunk, ending up with e.g. zero-sized files in our branch which were removed from trunk, or we even couldn't merge at all, and I had to resort to underlying subversion repository for merging. As a result, we're currently migrating to mercurial.

Andrey

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Git and GCC
  - From: Daniel Berlin

References:
- Git and GCC
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: Git and GCC
  - From: Samuel Tardieu
- Re: Git and GCC
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: Git and GCC
  - From: NightStrike
- Re: Git and GCC
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Git and GCC
  - From: Vincent Lefevre

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]