This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Issue with fixincludes (?) and `limits.h'

From: Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gnu dot org>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, joseph at codesourcery dot com
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 02:21:36 +0100
Subject: Re: Issue with fixincludes (?) and `limits.h'
References: <20071203224854.GS16318@fencepost.gnu.org> <m3odd7cqp9.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <20071203234733.GT16318@fencepost.gnu.org> <m3k5nvclrt.fsf@localhost.localdomain>

Hello!

On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 05:05:10PM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge@gnu.org> writes:
> > On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 03:18:42PM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > > Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge@gnu.org> writes:
> > > > Is this a GCC issue or should the glibc build system be adding a
> > > > ``-isystem [GCC target]/4.3.0/include-fixed''?
> > > 
> > > The latter.
> > > 
> > > http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2007-03/msg00017.html
> > 
> > I will ping the glibc crew and put your patch into the glibc bugzilla,
> > for CVS HEAD and glibc-2_7-branch, OK?
> 
> It's not my patch

Indeed.  Sorry.

> but that sounds like a good plan.

<http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5442>


Regards,
 Thomas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

References:
- Issue with fixincludes (?) and `limits.h'
  - From: Thomas Schwinge
- Re: Issue with fixincludes (?) and `limits.h'
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Issue with fixincludes (?) and `limits.h'
  - From: Thomas Schwinge
- Re: Issue with fixincludes (?) and `limits.h'
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]