This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC. Choice A or B?
2007/11/26, Robert Dewar <dewar@adacore.com> wrote:
> J.C. Pizarro wrote:
>
> > You've reason, the world "full" can mean one of many scenarios depending
> > in how wants it to "be filled"!
> >
> > So, it's afraid unknownly in what scenario has to be filled.
> >
> > But, the most important thing is the idea of separation to two choices
> > of debugging, not only the correctness 100% of its implementation.
> >
> > In the context of this topic, the phrase "full debugged information" means
> > all thing that needs the "step to step" debugger as line by line,
> > frame by frame, expression by expression, etc not overenginnering it.
> >
> > Too, it means that it doesn't lack any thing needed by the "step to step"
> > debugger.
> >
> > Its "fullness" depends in what "step to step" debugger we go to use it?
> >
> > Sincerely, J.C.Pizarro
>
> I tried hard to understand the above, but I am afraid it got so garbled
> in the english that it is impossible to understand what you are saying :-(
Paradoxing the "fullness":
---------------------------------
To you, "I want a full drink of water".
And you say me,
"what? a glass? a bottle? a jug? a barrel? a deposit? a reservoir?"
J.C.Pizarro (sorry, i'm a bad english speaker)