This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: How widely used are <ext/hash_set> and <ext/hash_map>?
- From: Marcus Meissner <meissner at suse dot de>
- To: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 23:29:42 +0200
- Subject: Re: How widely used are <ext/hash_set> and <ext/hash_map>?
- References: <20071026044006.GB31552@synopsys.com>
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 09:40:06PM -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> The thread arguing about this has gone on for a while, so I think
> it's time to gather some data to answer the question of just how bad
> it will be if we accept the decision to move ext/hash_set and ext_hash_map
> into a different directory and to deprecate them.
>
> Any of you out there who put out distros or port collections: how many
> packages in your distro use these classes? You can grep for
>
> '# *include *<ext/hash'
>
> I'm particularly interested in the "Debian number", since the package
> collection is so large. Other information about use of these classes
> will be interesting as well.
For SUSE the ones the grep above found:
- kdevelop3
- amarok
- xmms-kde
- apt
- abiword
- pan
- scim
- kseg
- pdns
Mostly one or two occurences.
Ciao, Marcus