This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Removal of pre-ISO C++ items from include/backwards


On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, skaller wrote:

| 
| On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 12:40 -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| 
| > | I think this is the wrong idea. Deprecated does carry a lot
| > | of weight. It allows a new compiler without a legacy
| > | to elide the feature and specify it is ISO compliant
| > | 'minus' the deprecated features, which is quite different
| > | from 'non-compliant'.
| > 
| > Do you know of any of those compilers with user base we can talk to?
| 
| In approximation of the feature, yes: gcc!

I asking for an *existing* compiler, not a hypothetical one we have
not released yet -- therefore we don't know what is in it.  

-- Gaby


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]