This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

RE: From SSA back to GIMPLE.

From: "Dave Korn" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>
To: "'skaller'" <skaller at users dot sourceforge dot net>, "'Paolo Bonzini'" <bonzini at gnu dot org>
Cc: "'J.C. Pizarro'" <jcpiza at gmail dot com>, "'Jose .'" <kasty dot jose at gmail dot com>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "'Diego Novillo'" <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:21:06 +0100
Subject: RE: From SSA back to GIMPLE.
References: <998d0e4a0710220658t37d6ca23m252ac15645d94292@mail.gmail.com> <471CB47B.5060705@gnu.org> <1193077899.5812.86.camel@rosella.wigram>

On 22 October 2007 19:32, skaller wrote:

> On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 16:32 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
>> I don't know what you mean, but yes, there is value in going to SSA and
>> back.  SSA makes global optimization much easier, and that's the main
>> improvement introduced in GCC 4.0 and later refined.
> 
> IMHO gcc was pretty crappy until 4.0. 

  You dare to besmirch the hallowed memory of 2.95.4?  Prepare to die!



 ;-)

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....

Follow-Ups:
- Re: From SSA back to GIMPLE.
  - From: Jamie Lokier

References:
- Re: From SSA back to GIMPLE.
  - From: J.C. Pizarro
- Re: From SSA back to GIMPLE.
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: From SSA back to GIMPLE.
  - From: skaller

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]