This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: GCC 4.2.2 RC2 Available


Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:

> [ I posted this before but I think you missed it. Otherwise let me
> know. I don't want to be annoying. ]

You're not being annoying.  In general, if you send me a message
explicitly (i.e., I'm in the To: or Cc: field), and you don't get a
reply, the right assumption is that either I've not replied yet, or that
I've somehow missed the message.  In either case, if you feel it's
urgent, please feel free to ping me again -- as you did here.

> Would you consider the patch in
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-09/msg01735.html before the
> release?

It doesn't look like that patch has been approved for mainline.  If it
is approved there, then it is OK for the 4.2 branch, after the 4.2.2
release.

> Also, the script that generates the release is supposed to generate
> the install documents but, that doesn't seem to be working because GCC
> 4.0.0 and GCC 4.1.0 contained a lot of HTML files in INSTALL/.
> However, the HTML files are missing in GCC 4.2.0 and in this GCC 4.2.2
> RC2.

Good catch.  Looking back at the build logs, I see:

/scratch/mitchell/gcc-releases/gcc-4.2.2-RC-20070927/gcc-4.2.2-RC-20070927/gcc/doc/include/gcc-common.texi:11:
@include `gcc-vers.texi': No such file or directory.

It looks like the problem here is that the release script builds the
documentation before building the compiler.  That used to work, but no
longer does, because the documentation now depends on a file that is
created by the build process.

So, the right fix is probably to (a) apply your patch or an equivalent,
and then (b) modify the release script so that instead of explicitly
building the installation docs before the compiler is built, it does
that afterwards -- or just relies on the compiler build to install the
documentation.

In either case, I don't think that this is a showstopper.  (AFAIK,
you're the first person to notice this, and you've indicated that it's
now a relatively long-standing bug.)

Thanks,

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]