This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk


On 9/23/07, Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 23/09/2007, Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 9/23/07, Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 23/09/2007, Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On 9/23/07, Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Am I wrong? I have the same problem when I try to enable SSA at O0 and
> > > > > my current solution is the dummy pass.
> > > >
> > > > Right, a dummy pass after salias works.
> > > >
> > >
> > > And *before* salias? Does it make a difference? It suits me better for
> > > my purposes.
> >
> > No, after salias you need to run rebuild_alias.  And for efficiency you'd
> > of course remove the TODO from salias itself.
> >
>
> I am not so concerned about efficiency ATM, I am trying to build SSA at O0.

If you only want simple SSA you should look at doing expansion after
early optimization.  That goes into SSA w/o computing real aliases.
Or what are you really trying to do?

Richard.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]