This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] missing return warnings

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 15:54:00 -0700
Subject: Re: [RFC] missing return warnings
References: <20070906070107.GQ30523@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <46E06ACF.50708@codesourcery.com> <20070906225007.GX30523@kam.mff.cuni.cz>

Jan Hubicka wrote:

> I am basically trying to avoid need for DECL_INLINE (while keeping
> DECL_DECLARED_INLINE and DECL_UNINLINABLE for frontend use) - inliner is
> now doing all the job himself to figure out what is or isn't needed.

That certainly makes sense to me.

> With the noreturn warning made unconditional:

...

> With the noreturn warning disabled completely:

...

> So it seems to be all about those warnings now.

OK, that sounds pretty encouraging.

Thansk,

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] missing return warnings
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- [RFC] missing return warnings
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: [RFC] missing return warnings
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [RFC] missing return warnings
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]