This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Implementing VMX128 AltiVec Variant


Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Gordan Bobic <gordan@bobich.net> writes:

These are the only place I found references to them, apart from the
files in the gcc/ada directory:

gcc/ada/g-alveop.adb
gcc/ada/g-alveop.ads
gcc/ada/g-alleve.adb
gcc/ada/g-alleve.ads

I ignored these - I am making a rash assumption here that these are
not too important for a C/C++ only build, but I'd like some
confirmation on that. What are the above ada files for?

I don't know what they are for, but I can confirm that they are irrelevant for a C/C++ build.

Just out of interest, I only downloaded the core, gcc and g++ tar balls of the source. Why are the above ada files in there if they are irrelevant for a C/C++ only build?


With the modifications I made, GCC still compiled fine. However,
libgcc and libstdc++ DO still get build with the missing instructions
(according to objdump -D). Why is that? Is that a consequence of the
ADA files? Or something else? Where should I look? Is the it ada files
that are the cause of the problem I'm seeing?

It must be something else. I'm not sure what, though. It might be something as simple as an instruction built from substrings. For example, search for altivec_vmsumu<VI_char>m in altivec.md.

Hmm, fair point. I'll have a re-check for this. I thought I weeded all those out, but I might have missed some.


Thanks.

Gordan


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]