This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Why is building a cross compiler "out-of-the-box" always broken?

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <rask at sygehus dot dk>
Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel dot crashing dot org>, "Stephen M. Kenton" <skenton at ou dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 10:09:25 +0200
Subject: Re: Why is building a cross compiler "out-of-the-box" always broken?
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gcc.devel
References: <46C603EC.4070004@ou.edu> <1d2196e08f6a3da5183e4aa9d9fa06bd@kernel.crashing.org> <20070818201155.GZ25795@sygehus.dk>

Thanks for reminding me to ping that patch.

Could you try moving this case statement

+	case "$target" in
+	  i[[3456]]86-*-elf* | i[[3456]]86-*-coff*)
+	    libgloss_dir=i386
+	    ;;
+	  m68hc11-*-* | m6811-*-* | m68hc12-*-* | m6812-*-*)
+	    libgloss_dir=m68hc11
+	    ;;

above in another "case $target in" statement?

Thanks,

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why is building a cross compiler "out-of-the-box" always broken?
  - From: Steve Kenton
- Re: Why is building a cross compiler "out-of-the-box" always broken?
  - From: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen

References:
- Why is building a cross compiler "out-of-the-box" always broken?
  - From: Stephen M. Kenton
- Re: Why is building a cross compiler "out-of-the-box" always broken?
  - From: Segher Boessenkool
- Re: Why is building a cross compiler "out-of-the-box" always broken?
  - From: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]