This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: reload question

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: Pat Haugen <pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich dot Weigand at de dot ibm dot com>
Date: 13 Aug 2007 10:31:14 -0700
Subject: Re: reload question
References: <OF3325FCD8.60F44284-ON86257336.004E060C-86257336.0051AE42@us.ibm.com>

Pat Haugen <pthaugen@us.ibm.com> writes:

> I was thinking of reordering the if tests such that we check if op0 is
> already ok_for_base or op1 is ok_for_index before we check the inverse
> conditions (which result in swapping the classes of the operands). I would
> also change the default else leg such that it keeps op0 as the base reg and
> op1 as an index reg.

That patch would probably be fine.  Ideally you would do some
performance testing on a couple of primary platforms.

Ian

References:
- Re: reload question
  - From: Pat Haugen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]