This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
vect failures at -m64 on darwin
- From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr (Dominique Dhumieres)
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:07:32 +0200
- Subject: vect failures at -m64 on darwin
Jack Howarth has reported vect failures at -m64 on darwin with gfortran:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-08/msg00041.html
I see the same kind of failures with gcc 4.3.0 revision 127178:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-33.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorization not profitable 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-76b.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 1 loops 0
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-76b.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorization not profitable 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-28.c scan-tree-dump-times Alignment of access forced using peeling 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-33.c scan-tree-dump-times Alignment of access forced using peeling 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-42.c scan-tree-dump-times Vectorizing an unaligned access 2
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-42.c scan-tree-dump-times Alignment of access forced using peeling 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-44.c scan-tree-dump-times Alignment of access forced using peeling 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-50.c scan-tree-dump-times Alignment of access forced using peeling 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-70.c scan-tree-dump-times Alignment of access forced using peeling 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-87.c scan-tree-dump-times Alignment of access forced using peeling 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-88.c scan-tree-dump-times Alignment of access forced using peeling 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-91.c scan-tree-dump-times Vectorizing an unaligned access 0
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-91.c scan-tree-dump-times Alignment of access forced using peeling 3
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-93.c scan-tree-dump-times Alignment of access forced using peeling 3
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-96.c scan-tree-dump-times Vectorizing an unaligned access 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-96.c scan-tree-dump-times Alignment of access forced using peeling 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/section-anchors-pr27770.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/section-anchors-vect-69.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/section-anchors-vect-69.c scan-tree-dump-times Alignment of access forced using peeling 4
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-69.c scan-tree-dump-times Alignment of access forced using peeling 2
A quick look at the *.vect files show that there is no lines with "peeling".
Is this a bug in the build or in the testsuite?
Dominique