This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: assembly: control flow graphs (and optimizations)

From: Robert Dewar <dewar at adacore dot com>
To: Sunzir Deepur <sunzird at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 07:59:00 -0400
Subject: Re: assembly: control flow graphs (and optimizations)
References: <b758af9e0707220350q161907f7j3ed6d2274726aa2a@mail.gmail.com> <46A33EA3.20903@adacore.com> <b758af9e0707230407kbb78836s5398ca708aea81a1@mail.gmail.com>

Sunzir Deepur wrote:

On 7/22/07, Robert Dewar <dewar@adacore.com> wrote:
Sunzir Deepur wrote:
is there a meaning for control flow graphs of assembly files (.S)
(e.g. those that are emitted using -fdump-rtl-*) ?
this is neither possible nor desirable.
Ok. but is there a way to produce CFG data out of assembly files ?

Not as things stand, this would require some non-trivial work ...

I'm not asking this for optimizations, I really just need CFG of asm files.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: assembly: control flow graphs (and optimizations)
  - From: Sunzir Deepur

References:
- assembly: control flow graphs (and optimizations)
  - From: Sunzir Deepur
- Re: assembly: control flow graphs (and optimizations)
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: assembly: control flow graphs (and optimizations)
  - From: Sunzir Deepur

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]