This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFH: GPLv3
>>>>> Richard Kenner writes:
Richard> Now, suppose I apply it to the GPLv2 version of the file. One could argue
Richard> that such file is now GPLv3 and I think that'd be correct. But since the
Richard> parts of the file being patched are identical, the patch is indistinguishable
Richard> from one that's derived from GPLv2 text. This strikes me as a VERY murky
Richard> legal areas.
I believe this scenario is exactly RMS's expectation if someone
other than the original author copies / backports a patch from a GPLv3