This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

RE: no_new_pseudos

From: "Dave Korn" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>
To: "'Kenneth Zadeck'" <zadeck at naturalbridge dot com>, "'Alexandre Oliva'" <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Cc: "'Richard Earnshaw'" <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>, "'gcc'" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "'Steven Bosscher'" <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>, "'Bonzini, Paolo'" <bonzini at gnu dot org>, "'Ian Lance Taylor'" <iant at google dot com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:34:32 +0100
Subject: RE: no_new_pseudos
References: <46892386.9080103@naturalbridge.com> <1183392984.3816.1.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <or7ipi4jwe.fsf@oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <468ABC2D.8090401@naturalbridge.com>

On 03 July 2007 22:14, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:

> David Edelsohn points out that some of the expanders could have all of
> this code removed since expanders only run before reload. I do not know
> how to figure this out.

  I thought that movMM expanders could still be run /during/ reload, at the
very least?  Or does "some of the expanders" mean "excluding movMM" in
particular?  (I'm not sure if I should infer the word "those" between "removed
since" and "expanders only").

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....

Follow-Ups:
- RE: no_new_pseudos
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: no_new_pseudos
  - From: Kenneth Zadeck

References:
- no_new_pseudos
  - From: Kenneth Zadeck
- Re: no_new_pseudos
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: no_new_pseudos
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: no_new_pseudos
  - From: Kenneth Zadeck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]