On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:48:22PM -0700, Brooks Moses wrote:
> I have no objection to this as a custom for GFortran, certainly -- I
> think it's a very good idea, and as a custom I very much support it.
> However, there have historically been reasonable exceptions to it. In
> particular, I've committed several documentation patches without review,
> and I have seen a few small patches submitted by maintainers for
> comments rather than a formal review and then committed when there were
> no dissenting comments. My understanding at the time was that these
> were entirely acceptable things to do; is this still true, or no?
As the Fortran maintainer the pre-approved your doc patches (and
Daniel's patches) I feel I should comment. The gfortran docs
were in such a mess that neither you nor Danial could possibly
commit a change that would make the docs worse. Well, I guess
you could have, but your previous involvement in the mailing list
suggested otherwise.
I haven't looked at the guidelines for this new category in that
I doubt it will change the day-to-day interaction of the gfortran
developers. In general, we ask for reviews when necessary and
commit obvious fixes as they arise. In my 4+ years of hacking on
gfortran, I cannot recall a single dispute among the developers.
Sure, there's been disagreement, but not dispute.