This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

RE: Where is ld.so and libdl.so built from

From: Mayank Kumar <mayank at microsoft dot com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:13:26 +0800
Subject: RE: Where is ld.so and libdl.so built from
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
References: <76EBE649FB0E0E4DA883B5840459059F143A4C2252@AA-EXMSG-C412.southpacific.corp.microsoft.com> <de8d50360703260906i241e9df1v960666a545646f9b@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks for this information. I wanted to take a look at the code.
Yes MS has its own shared library loader and libc.

Thanks
Mayank

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Pinski [mailto:pinskia@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 9:36 PM
To: Mayank Kumar
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Where is ld.so and libdl.so built from

On 3/26/07, Mayank Kumar <mayank@microsoft.com> wrote:
> In gcc packages, I could not find ld.so and libdl.so
> Binutils only contains ld.
>
> Where can I find the gnu source code for libdl.so and ld.so

They come from glibc which I doubt MS uses as they have their own
shared library (dll) loader and libc.

-- pinski

References:
- Where is ld.so and libdl.so built from
  - From: Mayank Kumar
- Re: Where is ld.so and libdl.so built from
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]