This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: We're out of tree codes; now what?

From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
To: paul at codesourcery dot com
Cc: Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot com, dje at watson dot ibm dot com, doug dot gregor at gmail dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu, mark at codesourcery dot com, mrs at apple dot com, njn at csse dot unimelb dot edu dot au, stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 21:10:04 EDT
Subject: Re: We're out of tree codes; now what?
References: <Pine.GSO.4.61.0703200808420.21298@mulga.csse.unimelb.edu.au> <46030BD4.8000406@codesourcery.com> <10703222325.AA25217@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <200703222339.39304.paul@codesourcery.com>

> If nothing else you've got bigger code (increased icache pressure).

Yeah, but a 3% peformance hit due to that?  It's hard to argue with
measurements, but something sounds fishy to me ..

References:
- Re: We're out of tree codes; now what?
  - From: Nicholas Nethercote
- Re: We're out of tree codes; now what?
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: We're out of tree codes; now what?
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: We're out of tree codes; now what?
  - From: Paul Brook

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]