This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
> So the memory hit shouldn't be > as big as e.g. going to 16 bit tree codes if that means increasing the size > of most of the trees the compiler uses.
Yes, this is true.
But this could be solved if all LANG_TREE_x bits could move to language specific trees, could it?
Gr. Steven
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |