Re: Adding a new gcc dir

["Paulo J. Matos" <pocm at soton dot ac dot uk>]

On 3/7/07, Paulo J. Matos <pocm@soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> On 3/7/07, Dave Korn <dave.korn@artimi.com> wrote:
> > On 07 March 2007 14:30, gcc-gpu@adrenalin-junkie.net wrote:
> >
> > > Is it time to offer "second-strap" level of compilation? Ie allow C99 to
> > > bootstrap the creation of a basic GCC compiler, then allow a second compile
> > > using the basic GCC compiler to get the full compiler.
> > >
> > > Nick
> >
> >   Effectively that's what bootstrapping already does, so IIUIC, as long as no
> > C99 creeps into the core C language compiler, it /should/ work to use C99 (and
> > indeed GCC language extensions, attributes etc. etc.) in e.g. the cp/
> > subdirectory or other places where the files only relate to other languages.
> >
>
> But if I add in my pass // args, or mixed code and variable
> declarations for example, I get warnings, so it is not that clean.
> Maybe only by removing pedantic, are you able to do that.

Moreover, for some reason when using malloc, a lot of poisonous malloc
warning come up which are solved by using xmalloc instead, which is
another thing I cannot figure out. What is better in xmalloc than
malloc?

> Right?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Paulo Matos
>
> >     cheers,
> >       DaveK
> > --
> > Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Paulo Jorge Matos - pocm at soton.ac.uk
> http://www.personal.soton.ac.uk/pocm
> PhD Student @ ECS
> University of Southampton, UK


--
Paulo Jorge Matos - pocm at soton.ac.uk
http://www.personal.soton.ac.uk/pocm
PhD Student @ ECS
University of Southampton, UK