This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++
On 18/01/07, Gabriel Dos Reis <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
| On 17/01/07, Paolo Carlini <email@example.com> wrote:
| > ... thanks a lot Gaby both for your practical and theoretical
| > investigations into this issue, both right to the point! Now, in my
| > opinion, we should simply remove the bits about signed -> unsigned from
| > -Wconversion.
| I am not sure I am following the conversation.
here it is in pseudo-code.
int x = some value;
unsigned y = x // please don't spit noise here
Does that apply also to:
unsigned int y = -10;