This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question.

From: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
To: Sergei Organov <osv at javad dot com>
Cc: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:17:20 -0800
Subject: Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question.
References: <eo2mf2$41h$1@sea.gmane.org> <m3slei29vu.fsf@dhcp-172-18-118-195.corp.google.com> <87hcuxg0uv.fsf@javad.com> <17830.16211.478559.856410@zebedee.pink> <87d55lfyqu.fsf@javad.com> <17830.18220.656792.559430@zebedee.pink> <878xg9fxev.fsf@javad.com>

On Jan 11, 2007, at 6:30 AM, Sergei Organov wrote:

So "h1.f" is not an object? If it is not, it brings us back to the validity of my boo() function from the initial post, for which 2 persons (3 including me) thought it's OK:

Would be nice for you to raise the issue directly with the C standards committee... Would be nice to see them improve the wording in the tricky corners.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question.
  - From: Sergei Organov

References:
- Tricky(?) aliasing question.
  - From: Sergei Organov
- Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question.
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question.
  - From: Sergei Organov
- Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question.
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question.
  - From: Sergei Organov
- Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question.
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question.
  - From: Sergei Organov

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]