This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Build problem with gcc 4.3.0 20070108 (experimental)
- From: George R Goffe <grgoffe at yahoo dot com>
- To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, George R Goffe <grgoffe at yahoo dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:51:20 -0800 (PST)
- Subject: Re: Build problem with gcc 4.3.0 20070108 (experimental)
Howdy,
The build succeeded.
Thanks for the help.
George...
--- Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz> wrote:
> > >
> > > > >`/rb.exphome/tools/gcc/obj-i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc'
> > > > >make[2]: *** [all-stage2-gcc] Error 2
> > > > >make[2]: Leaving directory `/rb.exphome/tools/gcc/obj-i686-pc-linux-gnu'
> > > > >make[1]: *** [stage2-bubble] Error 2
> > > > >make[1]: Leaving directory `/rb.exphome/tools/gcc/obj-i686-pc-linux-gnu'
> > > > >make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
> > > >
> > > > That's honza's patch - but bootstrap doesn't abort for me at that point.
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > I've comited the obvious fix. Sorry for that. I wonder why the
> > > bootstrap doesn't fail on all targets?
> >
> > This only fixes on of the problems, the other one is
> > function_and_variable_visibility needs to return unsigned int and 0.
> > This fixes an ICE building libgcc for spu-elf on powerpc-linux-gnu.
>
> Hi,
> I've commit the obvious fix too and I doubly apologize for the problems.
> I've doublechecked that the patch tested ineed was the same as comitted
> and it is the case. I don't see how it can possibly pass -Werror
> bootstrap, will investigate it tomorrow.
>
> Hope that all bootstraps are fine now!
>
> Index: ChangeLog
> ===================================================================
> --- ChangeLog (revision 120589)
> +++ ChangeLog (working copy)
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> 2007-01-08 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
>
> * tree-vectorizer.c (gate_increase_alignment): Fix return type.
> + * ipa.c (function_and_variable_visibility): Fix return type.
>
> 2007-01-08 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
>
> Index: ipa.c
> ===================================================================
> --- ipa.c (revision 120580)
> +++ ipa.c (working copy)
> @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ cgraph_remove_unreachable_nodes (bool be
> in language point of view but we want to overwrite this default
> via visibilities for the backend point of view. */
>
> -static void
> +static unsigned int
> function_and_variable_visibility (void)
> {
> struct cgraph_node *node;
> @@ -272,6 +272,7 @@ function_and_variable_visibility (void)
> fprintf (dump_file, "\n\n");
> }
> cgraph_function_flags_ready = true;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> struct tree_opt_pass pass_ipa_function_and_variable_visibility =
>
=====
_/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ -----
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/ -----
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
_/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ -----
"It's not what you know that hurts you, It's what you know that ain't so." Will Rogers
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com