This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Build snapshots according to a more regular schedule

From: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
To: David Fang <fang at csl dot cornell dot edu>
Cc: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 11:52:23 -0800
Subject: Re: Build snapshots according to a more regular schedule
References: <84fc9c000701051041q22fc9b33tf46b43082796cdb1@mail.gmail.com> <20070105140601.D29335-100000@maxwell.csl.cornell.edu>

On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 02:23:36PM -0500, David Fang wrote:
> User chiming in: before retiring 4.0, one would be more easily convinced
> to make a transition to 4.1+ if the regressions from 4.0 to 4.1 numbered
> fewer.  In the database, I see only 79 (P3+) regressions in 4.1 that are
> not in 4.0 (using only summary matching).  Will these get a bit more
> attention for the upcoming 4.1.2 release?

We need to clean up Bugzilla a bit to make sure that those numbers are
accurate.

References:
- Re: Build snapshots according to a more regular schedule
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Build snapshots according to a more regular schedule
  - From: David Fang

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]