This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Top level libgcc checked in
- From: Paolo Bonzini <paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch>
- To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 08:42:54 +0100
- Subject: Re: Top level libgcc checked in
- References: <1167890836.15081.9.camel@localhost> <200701040611.l046BJ5M007394@localhost.localdomain>
Andrew Pinski wrote:
We should also be very careful not to introduce differences between
native and cross compilers. So, we should have no run-time tests, no
tests that look at /proc, headers in /usr/include, etc.
Right--I was really only suggesting tests that can be done at
compile-time. Perhaps there isn't a lot of room for improvement after
The only test I can think of that could be improved if it is not already
done, is the check for visibility support.
In fact that's already done. :-)
I'm sure that a few other changes can be made, such as sizeof tests.
These however are less interesting than untangling the config files.