This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
Cc: Paul Eggert <eggert at CS dot UCLA dot EDU>, autoconf-patches at gnu dot org, bug-gnulib at gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 31 Dec 2006 10:48:20 +0100
Subject: Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
References: <20061231010207.C200A48CC4B@nile.gnat.com> <10612310154.AA00174@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <87ejqgsjc7.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu> <20061231064859.GA32094@synopsys.com>

Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM> writes:

[...]

|                                                      though I vaguely
| recall some complaints that you couldn't build v7 Unix if your compiler
| generated integer overflow traps.

this matches what I've told recently by some people who worked at bell
labs, in the unix room. 

-- Gaby

Follow-Ups:
- Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
  - From: Richard Kenner

References:
- Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
  - From: Paul Eggert
- Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
  - From: Joe Buck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]