Re: build failure, GMP not available

[Geoffrey Keating <geoffk at apple dot com>]

On 30/10/2006, at 1:24 PM, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:

> On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Geoffrey Keating wrote:
>
> > > Also, although I experience no regressions, i'll point out that  
> > > there
> > > is no automated tested for macintel darwin that posts to
> > > gcc-testresults, which does not bode well for something you would  
> > > like
> > > to be a primary platform.
> >
> > You are not seeing any posts because there has never been a  
> > successful
> > build in the tester's environment.  Guess what the current problem  
> > is.
>
> I'd like to point out that the powerpc-darwin reports we were  
> getting from
> the regression tester prior to this requirement were not including
> gfortran results:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-10/msg01062.html
>
> One of the benefits IMHO of requiring gmp/mpfr is that fortran how  
> always
> works regardless.  I hope once you get these libraries installed  
> that you
> add back fortran to the languages tested on both x86 and powerpc.

My policy is that I do not add or remove languages (or multilibs,  
testcases, patches, libraries, configure flags, or anything else).   
What gets built and tested is '.../configure && make'.  That way (a)  
I know I'm testing the default which is presumably what most people  
use and (b) I don't have to deal with time-consuming arguments about  
what should or should not be in the tester.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature