This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: compile time regression

From: Paolo Bonzini <paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch>
To: Paolo Bonzini <paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 07:53:54 +0200
Subject: Re: compile time regression
References: <20060822135628.ee69bd5f.bkoz@redhat.com> <44EB4EAF.50309@redhat.com> <44EB5438.2000405@lu.unisi.ch>

I'm starting a bootstrap timing comparison to find if this is a red herring. I'll get the results next morning.

Hm, nope:

$ gcc_test --base-gcc-branch=HEAD:r116077 --peak-gcc-branch=HEAD:r116080
...
Bootstrapping base compiler took 13999 secs
...
Bootstrapping peak compiler took 13993 secs

Paolo

References:
- compile time regression
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: compile time regression
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: compile time regression
  - From: Paolo Bonzini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]