This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Unnecessary call to mark_temp_addr_taken in calls.c (related to pr25505)?

From: Josh Conner <jconner at apple dot com>
To: Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>
Cc: stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:48:35 -0700
Subject: Re: Unnecessary call to mark_temp_addr_taken in calls.c (related to pr25505)?
References: <44EA29D7.3090508@apple.com> <10608212253.AA25266@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <571f6b510608221141q3ad7ec64h39715b2388b1ff63@mail.gmail.com> <10608221924.AA01441@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>

Richard Kenner wrote:

> I found the test case.  As I suspected, it was on Sparc (the test case failed
> for a different reason on Mips) and was indeed a case where there were two
> function calls in the same parameter list of an outer call (though not the
> same function).  It was an Ada test case, which we had no place to put
> back in 1999.  Here it is.

Thanks for tracking this down.  I would offer to add this test case to
the test suite as my penance, but I don't have the ability to run ada
tests on any of my machines.

- Josh

References:
- Unnecessary call to mark_temp_addr_taken in calls.c (related to pr25505)?
  - From: Josh Conner
- Re: Unnecessary call to mark_temp_addr_taken in calls.c (related to pr25505)?
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: Unnecessary call to mark_temp_addr_taken in calls.c (related to pr25505)?
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: Unnecessary call to mark_temp_addr_taken in calls.c (related to pr25505)?
  - From: Richard Kenner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]