This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: local data flow

From: Joern RENNECKE <joern dot rennecke at st dot com>
To: Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck at naturalbridge dot com>
Cc: Joern Rennecke <amylaar at spamcop dot net>, gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, bernd dot schmidt at analog dot com
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:03:03 +0100
Subject: Re: local data flow
References: <20060717000039.3e9s08gw0gks008g@webmail.spamcop.net> <44BB833E.801@naturalbridge.com> <44BB9B6D.5090906@st.com> <44BBA096.403@naturalbridge.com> <44BBAE44.3070904@st.com> <44BBBA9A.3010505@naturalbridge.com> <44BBBE5A.7070803@st.com> <44BBC698.40801@naturalbridge.com> <44BBD77D.3030306@st.com> <44BBE56E.4040506@naturalbridge.com>

Kenneth Zadeck wrote:

is it really necessary to do your pass after reg stack. Given that there is no if conversion that runs after regstack what is your point?

I am talking about cross-jumping after regstack.

I should point out that there are no passes that currently use any dataflow after regstack.

That's because the current cross-jumping is so stupid.

References:
- Re: local data flow
  - From: Joern Rennecke
- Re: local data flow
  - From: Kenneth Zadeck
- Re: local data flow
  - From: Joern RENNECKE
- Re: local data flow
  - From: Kenneth Zadeck
- Re: local data flow
  - From: Joern RENNECKE
- Re: local data flow
  - From: Kenneth Zadeck
- Re: local data flow
  - From: Joern RENNECKE
- Re: local data flow
  - From: Kenneth Zadeck
- Re: local data flow
  - From: Joern RENNECKE
- Re: local data flow
  - From: Kenneth Zadeck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]