This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: LTO and Code Compaction \ Reverse Inlining \ Procedure Abstraction?

From: "Rafael EspÃndola" <rafael dot espindola at gmail dot com>
To: "Mark Mitchell" <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: "Miguel Angel" <miguel55angel at hotmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 08:22:51 -0300
Subject: Re: LTO and Code Compaction \ Reverse Inlining \ Procedure Abstraction?
References: <BAY110-F24DFA15DA53FC64F50E729B16C0@phx.gbl> <44BAEECE.8080108@codesourcery.com>

Some people call this "uninlining".  I've also heard the term
"procedural abstraction".  The generalization is to identify common code
fragments that can be turned into functions.  Then, replace the users of
the common code with function calls.


Is this the same as Code Factoring?
http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cfo.html

Best Regards,
Rafael

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LTO and Code Compaction \ Reverse Inlining \ Procedure Abstraction?
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- LTO and Code Compaction \ Reverse Inlining \ Procedure Abstraction?
  - From: Miguel Angel
- Re: LTO and Code Compaction \ Reverse Inlining \ Procedure Abstraction?
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]