This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: BIT_FIELD_REF on the LHS


Andrew Pinski wrote on 07/13/06 03:27:

> I don't see anything in either tree.def or tree-ssa.texi which would
> cause the orginal non-gimplified tree to be invalid.  So my question
> is should we document that BIT_FIELD_REF on the lhs for a SSA_NAME
> invalid gimple?
> 
SSA_NAMEs should not be valid operands for BIT_FIELD_REF, neither on the
LHS nor the RHS.  An SSA name is by definition a complete, atomic reference.

Got a test case where we produce BIT_FIELD_REF <SSA_NAME,...> in either
side of the assignment?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]