This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: BIT_FIELD_REF on the LHS
Andrew Pinski wrote on 07/13/06 03:27:
> I don't see anything in either tree.def or tree-ssa.texi which would
> cause the orginal non-gimplified tree to be invalid. So my question
> is should we document that BIT_FIELD_REF on the lhs for a SSA_NAME
> invalid gimple?
SSA_NAMEs should not be valid operands for BIT_FIELD_REF, neither on the
LHS nor the RHS. An SSA name is by definition a complete, atomic reference.
Got a test case where we produce BIT_FIELD_REF <SSA_NAME,...> in either
side of the assignment?