This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: externs and thread local storage

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Gary Funck <gary at intrepid dot com>
Cc: "'Gcc Mailing List'" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:22:15 -0700
Subject: Re: externs and thread local storage
References: <65FB4106-0EEE-49BB-AE0E-8FACEE85C9C4@physics.uc.edu> <JCEPIPKHCJGDMPOHDOIGOEIIDFAA.gary@intrepid.com>

On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 12:23:34PM -0700, Gary Funck wrote:
> In my view, this is implementation-defined, and generally can vary
> depending upon the underlying linker and OS technology.  Further,
> there is at least one known platform (IA64) which seems to not impose
> this restriction.

You're kidding, right?  *All* targets have to generate different
code for thread-local storage.  If it didn't, it wouldn't be
thread-local, would it?

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: externs and thread local storage
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: externs and thread local storage
  - From: Florian Weimer

References:
- Re: externs and thread local storage
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- RE: externs and thread local storage
  - From: Gary Funck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]