This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"


Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> writes:

[...]

| I personally don't agree that this needs to be a documented extension.
| I'm simply going on a more general rule which I tried to state above:
| I don't think we should insert a trap call for undefined code.

If it should not a documented extension, then it will "break" again, and
we will have this sort of discussion again.  If it should not be
documented, then it should stay as is.

-- Gaby


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]