This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, Yuri Pudgorodsky <yur at ptci dot ru>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr
Date: 05 Jul 2006 13:20:35 -0700
Subject: Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
References: <44AA67AE.4070509@ptci.ru> <m3lkr9e1h1.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <17578.43651.892156.272070@zebedee.pink> <m3d5cldsl8.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <44AB02BB.2030205@ptci.ru> <CB56011F-14CD-4167-BD15-655B19541B77@physics.uc.edu> <AEF79E5A-19FA-4150-8DFF-08C60DD66A5E@apple.com>

Mike Stump <mrs@apple.com> writes:

> On Jul 4, 2006, at 5:18 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > And I posted a patch to do the same in Objective-C mode as C mode :).
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-08/msg01013.html
> 
> Is the reason that Objective-C was excluded been fixed?  If so, while
> I don't like the semantics in place now, I'd rather have consistency
> with C/C++.  :-(

A version of Andrew's patch was checked in on 2005-05-24, by Ziemowit
Laski.  The languages are currently consistent.

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
  - From: Yuri Pudgorodsky

References:
- gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
  - From: Yuri Pudgorodsky
- Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
  - From: Yuri Pudgorodsky
- Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
  - From: Mike Stump

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]