This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Value numbering and volatility

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
To: "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 16:31:24 +0200
Subject: Re: Value numbering and volatility
References: <200606211605.20877.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <84fc9c000606210712g143b5092j2d558038732f6207@mail.gmail.com>

> What do you mean by "in the VALUE_HANDLE itself"?

Returning a different VALUE_HANDLE for each instance of a volatile expression.

> I think we should not bother value-numbering volatile mem-accesses at all.

I guess that would be even better. :-)

Thanks for the quick feedback.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

References:
- Value numbering and volatility
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: Value numbering and volatility
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]