This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c99 VLA semantics
Ok, good, you gave the same answers I was hoping for. :-)
On Jun 16, 2006, at 10:51 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
But the definition in terms of contained declarators hardly makes
things clear. I would say, however, that while VM-ness shouldn't
propagate out from function argument types to the type of the
function, it should so propagate from the function return type to
the type of the function.
:-) I agree, though, the standard should contain wording to directly
support this, long term. I do think it is what they meant, even if
they might not have known it. This would be my request for a DR on
the issue...
Thanks.