This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: help interpreting gcc 4.1.1 optimisation bug


On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 12:32:36PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> andrew@walrond.org writes:
>  > I want a reduced test case for this problem for bugzilla, but don't
>  > really know the exact cause. I _think_ code is being improperly
>  > optimized away, but I don't know. This function is part of a
>  > BigInteger library, and works perfectly upto and including -O2, but
>  > produces bogus results at -O3, unless I uncomment the debug_msg()
>  > line, which just dumps the contents of 'i' to the screen. I'm
>  > guessing that without it, the compiler fails to notice that i's
>  > contents are being accessed via the _front8/_back8 pointers, and
>  > throws the preceeding 'i' related code away. Heres the code:
>  > 
>  >     void Integer::export_bytes(Data& _buffer, PortMode _mode) const
>  >     {
>  >         debug_scope("export_bytes(Data&)");
>  > 
>  >         Integer i(*this,1);
>  > 
>  >         if (_mode==SIGNED) {
>  >             if (*mBack & TOP_BIT)
>  >                 i.grow(1,0);
>  >             if (sign()<0)
>  >                 i.twoscomplement();
>  >         }
>  > 
>  >         for (UnsignedW* p=i.mFront; p<=i.mBack; p++)
>  >             *p = host2little(*p);
>  > 
>  >         Unsigned8* _front8 = reinterpret_cast<Unsigned8*>(i.mFront);
>  >         Unsigned8* _back8 = _front8+(i.mSize*WORD_BYTES)-1;
>  >         if (_mode==UNSIGNED)
>  >             while (_back8!=_front8 and *_back8==0)
>  >                 _back8--;
>  >         else if (mSign==1)
>  >             while (_back8!=_front8 and *_back8==0 and
>  >                    !(*(_back8-1)&0x80))
>  >                 _back8--;
>  >         else
>  >             while (_back8!=_front8 and *_back8==0xff and
>  >                    *(_back8-1)&0x80)
>  >                 _back8--;
>  > 
>  >         //debug_msg(String("Force i\n")+i.dump());
>  > 
>  >         _buffer.assign(_front8, _back8+1);
>  >     }
>  > 
>  > Any thoughts on how to proceed?
> 
> I think your code is broken.  A reinterpret_cast from foo* to bar* is
> only well-defined if foo and bar are compatible types or one of
> {foo,bar} is type char.  I can't be sure from your code, but I'm
> guessing that i.mFront is not declared as a pointer to Unsigned8, but
> as a pointer to an incompatible type UnsignedW.
> 

typedef unsigned long UnsignedW;
typedef unsigned char Unsigned8;
typdef std::vector<Unsigned8> Data;

mFront is defined as UnsignedW*, an array of words constituting the
big integer. Having converted the words from host to little endian
with host2little(), I am simply reading (exporting) the bytes out into
a vector using std::vector::assign(InputIter first, InputIter last)

Seems legit, no?

> Andrew.
> 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]