This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary

From: Geoffrey Keating <geoffk at apple dot com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, dpatel at apple dot com, dberlin at dberlin dot org (Daniel Berlin)
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 17:25:32 -0700
Subject: Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary
References: <200606070020.k570Kt5q018902@earth.phy.uc.edu>

On 06/06/2006, at 5:20 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:

Right above, you said "We control the debug output machinery
generating this, and can simply tell it to only deal in one
language."  Here, you seem to be implying that the messages should be
localised in the language the compiler is going to output messages
in.  I suppose you could output both, but that still bloats object
files more than just using numbers.

Just output in English and let the IDE or the other tools translate it.

What's the difference between that and just outputting a number and letting the IDE or other tool translate it? Either way, you're going to need a fixed set of strings or numbers to translate.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary
  - From: Andrew Pinski

References:
- Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]