This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Question about testsuit for native 2.95.3 files and procedure.
- From: "J.J.Garcia" <stigmatedbrain at gmail dot com>
- To: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
- Cc: GCC Mailing List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Cross GCC Mailing List <crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 11:54:32 +0100
- Subject: Re: Question about testsuit for native 2.95.3 files and procedure.
- Openpgp: id=980CAD8A; url=http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x50D777A259E2B5CE
- References: <4402A72E.3040705@gmail.com> <20060227172429.GA2604@synopsys.com>
Yes, i know it's a long time since 2.95.3 but actually trying to improve new
functionalities for that release due it's working for ARC targets specially.
ARC was not supported after 2.95.3 if im not in mistake.
Next release, 3.0 it's containing a testsuite folder within, but that's not the
same for 2.95.3, this is why im searching the correct files to do the same,
actually im trying with 3.0 testsuite in place of 2.95.3 to see what happend
Help appreciatted,
TIA
Joe Buck wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 08:15:58AM +0100, J.J.Garcia wrote:
>
>>Just gathering info about passing the testsuite for gcc 2.95.3, i've just
>>downloaded the tarball from GNU and i realize that there is no specific
>>'testsuite' folder included.
>
>
> Is there a reason why you want to use a 6 1/2 year old compiler?
> (While 2.95.3 was released in 2001, it is basically a small patch to
> 2.95.2, from 1999, issued to address an incompatibility with the C
> library on GNU/Linux systems).
>
> The problem with asking for help with such an old version is that even the
> developers who worked on it and are still around have forgotten the
> details.
>