This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RTL alias analysis

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:58:08 -0800
Subject: Re: RTL alias analysis
References: <200512292242.17272.stevenb@suse.de> <43D11C2E.2020202@codesourcery.com> <200601201834.10881.steven.bosscher@gmail.com> <200601201839.21641.steven@gcc.gnu.org> <20060120210319.GA26696@redhat.com> <43D1559B.1050906@codesourcery.com>

On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 01:26:51PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> I guess a secondary question is: is the workaround sufficiently useful
> in many of the problematic cases and sufficiently non-harmful in other
> cases as to merit inclusion, given that we don't have a better solution?

I replied with my suggestion for a workaround in the thread
with the actual patch.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RTL alias analysis
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- Re: RTL alias analysis
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: RTL alias analysis
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: RTL alias analysis
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: RTL alias analysis
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: RTL alias analysis
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]