This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: insv vs one-bit fields

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:39:33 -0800
Subject: Re: insv vs one-bit fields
References: <200509030140.j831eKAS007043@greed.delorie.com> <20050904174712.GA6886@redhat.com> <200601032147.k03LlV73028561@greed.delorie.com> <200601200256.k0K2us9j019857@greed.delorie.com>

On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 09:56:54PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Nobody has said anything about this for the last two weeks.  Can we
> remove this restriction now?

Have you done any testing on common platforms to see what
happens when you change this?


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: insv vs one-bit fields
  - From: DJ Delorie

References:
- Re: insv vs one-bit fields
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: insv vs one-bit fields
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]