This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626)

From: Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu dot org>
To: Robert Dewar <dewar at adacore dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, John David Anglin <dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca>, schlie at comcast dot net, ian at airs dot com, jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 23:13:57 +0100
Subject: Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626)
References: <200601152113.k0FLDsmm002972@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> <200601152224.50986.steven.bosscher@gmail.com> <43CABF08.1070301@adacore.com>

> >For what it's worth, it annoys me to no end that you have managed to
> >turn more than a day of hard work to understand and fix PR24626 into
> >a discussion about defining undefined behavior.  I don't think I'll
> >ever look at HPPA bugs anymore if they don't affect me.
>
> Well we have to understand whether something is a bug
> before we go off "fixing" it.

Robert, 

You're proving my point.  Dave has completely confused the issue.

Had you looked at the bug report we're talking about, you would have
seen that it is a loop versioning bug papered over with a wrong fix.

It has absolutely _noting_ to do with unitialized variables or undefined
behavior.  Nothing.  Zilch.  Zero. 

Gr.
Steven

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626)
  - From: Robert Dewar

References:
- Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626)
  - From: John David Anglin
- Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626)
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626)
  - From: Robert Dewar

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]